Houseman v. Grossman
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 43, Jan. T., 1896, by defendants, from decree of C. P. Centre Co., Jan. T., 1893, No. 154, on bill in equity. Bill in equity to set aside an alleged fraudulent conveyance.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 43, Jan. T., 1896, by defendants, from decree of C. P. Centre Co., Jan. T., 1893, No. 154, on bill in equity. Bill in equity to set aside an alleged fraudulent conveyance. The master reported the facts to be as follows: 1. That Elizabeth Grossman, complainant’s intestate, died on or about October 7, 1892. 2. George Grossman died on or about June 19, 1891. 3. George Grossman left to survive him six children, namely: Ira Grossman, G. W. Grossman, Joseph Grossman, Elvira Showers, Jane Neese and Mary Gillett. 4. Elizabeth Grossman was a creditor of George Grossman, having an…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Cheep Justice Sterrett,
We find nothing in this record that requires either a reversal or modification of the decree, except as hereafter mentioned.
The questions involved, as far as they are material, have been fully considered and correctly decided by the learned judge who presided at the hearing. There appears to be nothing in either of them that requires further discussion. The period of sixty days, named in the decree, has expired, and the time should be so extended as to commence and take effect from the filing of this opinion.
With this modification, as to extension of the…
2Cited by20 opinions
- American Trust Co. v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Hyde v. BakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
- Bank of Pittsburgh v. Purcell Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Clauer v. ClauerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.