Legal Opinion

May v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 1, 1923No. 7 Div. 359PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.

Section 7894 of the Code of 1907 'provides that:

“On the trial of all indictments, complaints, or other criminal proceedings, the person on trial shall, at his own request, but not otherwise, be a competent witness; and his failure-to make such request shall not create any presumption against him, nor be the subject of comment by counsel.”

The defendant did not take the stand a» a witness in the case, and the solicitor in his argument t'o the jury stated:

“If he had an excuse, why didn’t he tell you about it? If he has a reason, why didn’t he give it?”

The logical and reasonable effect of these…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stone v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  2. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  3. Houston v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  4. Rollins v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Arant v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  2. Stephens v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  3. Everage v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947
  4. Grady v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  5. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API