Legal Opinion
May v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided February 1, 1923No. 7 Div. 359PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.
Section 7894 of the Code of 1907 'provides that:
“On the trial of all indictments, complaints, or other criminal proceedings, the person on trial shall, at his own request, but not otherwise, be a competent witness; and his failure-to make such request shall not create any presumption against him, nor be the subject of comment by counsel.”
The defendant did not take the stand a» a witness in the case, and the solicitor in his argument t'o the jury stated:
“If he had an excuse, why didn’t he tell you about it? If he has a reason, why didn’t he give it?”
The logical and reasonable effect of these…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stone v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
- Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Houston v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Rollins v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922
3Cited by10 opinions
- Arant v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Stephens v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Everage v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947
- Grady v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1980
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.