Hill v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.
In every criminal prosecution the burden is on the state to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the crime charged has been in fact committed, and that the accused is the person who committed it. Winslow v. State, 76 Ala. 42, 47; Smith v. State, 133 Ala. 145, 150, 31 South. 806, 01 Am. St. Rep. 21; Perry v. State, 155 Ala. 93, 46 South. 470; Sanders v. State, 167 Ala. 85, 52 South. 417, 28 L. R. A. (N. S.) 536.
Circumstantial evidence may afford satisfactory proof of the corpus delicti; and if any facts are shown from which the jury may reasonably infer that the crime has been committed, the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Winslow v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- Ryan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Matthews v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
- Patterson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Phillips v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
- Bridges v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
- Twilley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
- Desilvey v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.