Legal Opinion

Hill v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 4, 1922No. 7 Div. 224PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

In every criminal prosecution the burden is on the state to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the crime charged has been in fact committed, and that the accused is the person who committed it. Winslow v. State, 76 Ala. 42, 47; Smith v. State, 133 Ala. 145, 150, 31 South. 806, 01 Am. St. Rep. 21; Perry v. State, 155 Ala. 93, 46 South. 470; Sanders v. State, 167 Ala. 85, 52 South. 417, 28 L. R. A. (N. S.) 536.

Circumstantial evidence may afford satisfactory proof of the corpus delicti; and if any facts are shown from which the jury may reasonably infer that the crime has been committed, the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Winslow v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  2. Ryan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  3. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  4. Matthews v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  5. Patterson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Phillips v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  2. Bridges v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  3. Twilley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  4. Desilvey v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API