Legal Opinion
Reichhold Chemicals, Inc. v. Puremco Manufacturing Co.
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)
Decided May 5, 1993No. 10-91-209-CVPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
Appellant’s and Appellee’s motions for rehearing are denied. Our opinion and judgment dated April 7, 1993, are withdrawn, and the opinion and judgment dated May 5, 1993, are substituted therefor.
OPINION
VANCE, Justice.
In this suit brought under the Deceptive Trade Practices Act (DTPA), we determine that the court erred in admitting testimony from an expert witness after responses to discovery were not properly supplemented. Accordingly, we will reverse the judgment.
Puremco Manufacturing Company makes and sells dominos. It purchased part of the resin that it uses as a raw material for…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Alvarado v. Farah Manufacturing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
- Jackson v. Van WinkleTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Henry S. Miller Co. v. BynumTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. ValenciaTexas Supreme Court · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by13 opinions
- Vingcard A.S. v. Merrimac Hospitality Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2001
- Green v. Texas Department of Protective & Regulatory Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2000
- Melendez v. Exxon Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
- Kessler v. FanningCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Mauzey v. Sutliff, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.