Legal Opinion

Kessler v. Fanning

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 18, 1997No. 2-96-313-CVPublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRIGHAM, Justice.

Appellees John and Alison Fanning sued Appellants Paul and Mary Kessler for alleged misrepresentations regarding the condition of a house that the Kesslers sold to the Fannings. A jury found that the Kesslers violated provisions of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act (DTPA) by engaging in a “false, misleading, or deceptive act or practice that was a producing cause of damages” to the Fannings. See Tex. Bus. & Com.Code Ann. §§ 17.41-63 (Vernon 1987 & Supp.1997). The trial court accordingly entered judgment for the Fan-nings.

On appeal, the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Doe v. Boys Clubs of Greater Dallas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Beaumont Bank, N.A. v. BullerTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Worford v. StamperTexas Supreme Court · 1991

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. GJP, INC. v. Ghosh, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
  2. Main Place Custom Homes, Inc. v. HonakerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
  3. Diamond Offshore Servs. Ltd. v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Dunn v. Bank-Tec South, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2003
  5. In re Grand Theft Auto Video Game Consumer LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API