Legal Opinion

Mauzey v. Sutliff

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided April 17, 2003No. 03-02-00188-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LEE YEAKEL, Justice.

This is a medical malpractice action arising from the birth of Mikayla Mauzey who, at birth or soon thereafter, suffered from a respiratory disorder requiring seventeen days’ hospitalization. Her parents, appellants Mike and Melissa Mauzey (together the “Mauzeys”) sued appellees Lourell E. Sutliff, M.D. and the Shannon Clinic (the “Clinic”), Dr. Sutliff s employer. 1 The district court rendered judgment on the jury’s verdict that the Mauzeys take nothing; the Mauzeys appeal. We will affirm the district-court judgment.

BACKGROUND

Mikayla Mauzey was born as a result of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. City of Brownsville v. AlvaradoTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Beaumont Bank, N.A. v. BullerTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Gee v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Bodnow Corp. v. City of HondoTexas Supreme Court · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Leesboro Corp. v. Hendrickson, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010
  2. Leesboro Corporation v. Claude Hendrickson, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010
  3. in Re John Edward Morris, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010
  4. in the Matter of R. F., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API