Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Guttentag v. Huntley

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 24, 1923PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

The plaintiff, a constable, on or about October 5, 1920, made two valid attachments of an automobile, the property of one Arthur R. Grover, each by virtue of a writ wherein the Eastern Finance Corporation was named as plaintiff, and Grover as defendant.

The defendant conducted a garage and was authorized to receive automobiles for safe keeping and to issue tags therefor. The plaintiff delivered the automobile in question to an employee of the defendant and received from him an identifying tag or check in the usual form, a copy of which is annexed to the report. “ It is agreed that except as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stevens v. Stewart-Warner Speedometer Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  2. Murray v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  3. Syndicate v. GuttentagMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  4. Doyle v. Peerless Motor Car Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  5. Blaisdell v. Hersum & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Doherty v. ErnstMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  2. Row v. Home Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  3. Magaw v. BealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  4. Titcomb v. Bay State Grocery Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  5. John T. D. Blackburn, Inc. v. LivermoreMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API