Legal Opinion

Magaw v. Beals

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 10, 1930PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sanderson, J,

This is an action of tort in which the *337plaintiff recovered damages on three counts — two based upon the alleged institution without probable cause of a false and malicious action against her and upon maliciously causing an excessive attachment to be made of her personal property. No question is now raised as to the validity of the verdict for the plaintiff on these two counts.

The plaintiff also recovered damages on the fifth count for conversion alleging that a constable seized, under color of authority of a writ in an action of contract brought by the defendant against the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. De Young v. Frank A. Andrews Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Canning v. ShippeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  3. Cote v. New England Navigation Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  4. Stevens v. PierceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  5. Folsom v. ClemenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Evergreen Marine Corp. v. Six Consignments of Frozen ScallopsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  2. Franklin v. North Weymouth Cooperative BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  3. Sacchetti v. SpringerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  4. Boston Edison Co. v. Brookline Realty & Investment Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  5. Doyle v. Hasbro, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API