Legal Opinion
United States v. Haas
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 14, 1954PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEINFELD, District Judge.
The defendant Haas moves to dismiss an indictment charging him with perjury on the ground that he was compelled to testify before the Grand Jury which returned it in violation of his privilege against self-incrimination under the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution. The motion rests on the claim that Haas was served with a subpoena compelling his appearance and testimony before the Grand Jury and that he was not informed of his rights under the Fifth Amendment. The same Grand Jury which returned the perjury indictment now under attack, also returned an indictment…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Glickstein v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Mulloney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1935
- United States v. EdgertonDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1897
- O'CONNELL v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- United States v. KimballU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1902
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Hyman Harvey Klein, Maurice Haas, and Morris O. AlprinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- United States v. Hyman WinterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Jack Stanley, Thomas A. Warren, Isom Meyers, and Hubert Stanley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957
- United States v. GilboyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
- United States v. OkinDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.