United Properties Ltd. v. Walgreen Properties, Inc.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1DissentCastillo, Judge
{34} While I agree with the majority that our task in this case is to decide which line of cases best reflect the law and policy of New Mexico, I respectfully dissent. I believe that equity should be allowed to intervene because this case involves a possible forfeiture. The majority opinion decides as a matter of law that equity cannot be considered in cases where a tenant forgets to timely send a notice of lease renewal. This holding is based on three points: (1) courts may not rewrite obligations that the parties bargain for themselves; (2) in the absence of well-defined equitable…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nearburg v. Yates Petroleum Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
- Albuquerque National Bank v. Albuquerque Ranch Estates, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
- Martinez v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- Merrick v. StephensMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
- Ortiz v. LaneNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.