Legal Opinion · Dissent

United Properties Ltd. v. Walgreen Properties, Inc.

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided June 11, 2003No. 22,159, 22,298Published

1DissentCastillo, Judge

{34} While I agree with the majority that our task in this case is to decide which line of cases best reflect the law and policy of New Mexico, I respectfully dissent. I believe that equity should be allowed to intervene because this case involves a possible forfeiture. The majority opinion decides as a matter of law that equity cannot be considered in cases where a tenant forgets to timely send a notice of lease renewal. This holding is based on three points: (1) courts may not rewrite obligations that the parties bargain for themselves; (2) in the absence of well-defined equitable…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nearburg v. Yates Petroleum Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Albuquerque National Bank v. Albuquerque Ranch Estates, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Martinez v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Merrick v. StephensMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
  5. Ortiz v. LaneNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API