Legal Opinion

Zazo v. City of Akron

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 19, 1987No. 12995PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge, J.

Plaintiff-appellee, James Zazo, a fire equipment mechanic for defendant-appellant, city of Akron, was injured on the job on May 16, 1985. As a result, he missed forty-five days of work during the six-month service rating period. His workers’ compensation claim for the injury was approved. Because of the time missed, however, his rating report reflects a less-than-satisfactory rating both in attendance and in quantity of work for the period.

Zazo appealed the rating to the Civil Service Commission pursuant to Civil Service Rule 12. The commission, upon the recommendation of the city’s personnel…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clifford v. Cactus Drilling Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Slover v. BrownAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  3. Marinchek v. Brunswick Civil Service CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Beare v. City of EatonOhio Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. Riverdale Local School DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Knafel v. Pepsi-Cola Bottlers of Akron, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  3. Nuspl v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Knafel v. Pepsi-Cola Bottlers Of Akron, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  5. State v. Bradley-LewisOhio Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API