Legal Opinion

Nuspl v. City of Akron

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1991No. Nos. 90-763 and 90-2159PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

Appellants assert that since an appeal from a decision of a civil service commission to a court of common pleas is not expressly prohibited by R.C. 2506.01 or any other statute, an appeal of the commission’s decision is permitted. Appellants further submit that Section 5(2), Rule 2 of the Akron Civil Service Rules does not prohibit an appeal to the court of common pleas, and that, therefore, an appeal of a decision of the civil service commission is permitted under R.C. 2506.01 based on this court’s reasoning in Sutherland-Wagner v. Brook Park Civil Service Comm. (1987), 32 Ohio St.3d 323,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. M. J. Kelley Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Sutherland-Wagner v. Brook Park Civil Service Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Walker v. City of EastlakeOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Zazo v. City of AkronOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Marinchek v. Brunswick Civil Service CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Olentangy Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Delaware Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  2. Ohio v. Foster (In Re Foster)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2002
  3. McAlpin v. ShireyOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Olentangy Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Delaware Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  5. Schack v. Geneva Civil Service CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API