Legal Opinion
State v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 7, 1986PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Michael J. Dontzin, J.
Defendant Consolidated Edison of New York (Con Ed) seeks *58an order pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) and 3211 (a) (2) dismissing the action brought against it by the Attorney-General of New York. In that action, the Attorney-General sought civil damages and an injunction to compel Con Ed to comply with provisions of the Right to Know Law (Public Health Law art 48; Labor Law art 28), entitling employees to information and training regarding toxic substances to which they are exposed at the workplace.
Con Ed’s motion to dismiss is two-pronged. It challenges…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- United States v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- General American Tank Car Corp. v. El Dorado Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Civil Service Employees Ass'n v. County of OneidaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- People v. Elmhurst Milk & Cream Co.New York Supreme Court · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Frontier Insurance v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1993
- State v. Consolidated Edison Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986