Pack v. Newman
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtEeviN, J.
Under the agreement of the parties, the judgment awarding the sum in controversy to the plaintiffs cannot be sustained on this appeal unless the deed from the plaintiffs to the defendant Clarence Newman vested in the latter “a marketable and indefeasible title” to the real property whereof Sarah C. Dailey died seized and possessed.
A “marketable title” is one free from reasonable doubt in law or fact as to its validity. Winkler v. Neilinger, 153 Fla. 288, 14 So. 2d 403. An “indefeasible title” is a title which cannot be defeated, set aside, or made void. In re Van Cott’s Estate, 89 N.Y.S. 2d…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- City of Monroe v. NivenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- King v. . KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Speed v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- City Sash & Door Co. v. BunnWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Lee v. . RhodesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Kanoy v. HinshawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Speed v. . PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Luther v. LutherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Burkhead v. FarlowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Haw River Land & Timber Company, Incorporated George W. Riddle v. Lawyers Title Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.