Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Rathbone

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 8, 2004No. 0205-05104; A120176PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

Plaintiff appeals after the trial court granted summary judgment to defendants. ORCP 47 C. On appeal, plaintiff makes three assignments of error, arguing that the trial court erred in awarding judgment to defendants Gail F. Ott and Gail F. Ott, D. C., P. C. (Ott); Laslow’s Restaurant and Connie J. DeSilva dba Laslow’s Restaurant (Laslow’s); and Northwest Neighborhood Market (the Market) [Yong O. Lee and Kyong A. Lee (the Lees) dba the Market]. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Summary judgment is appropriate if the moving party has shown that there are no genuine issues of material fact…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Yogman v. ParrottOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Derenco, Inc. v. Benj. Franklin Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Sproul v. GilbertOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Hughes v. BembryOregon Supreme Court · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Delta Logistics, Inc. v. Employment Department Tax SectionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. Jim Schacher v. Donald DolphCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API