Legal Opinion

Bessemer Coal & Coke Co. v. Heiner

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 8, 1929No. 5642PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOONMAKER, District Judge.

The plaintiff has moved for judgment in this ease for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense.

This proceeding is under the Penn. Practice Act (Pa. St. 1920, § 17062 et seq., as amended), and raises the question of the sufficiency of the defense set out by the defendant in his affidavit of defense. This is an action to recover federal income taxes alleged to have been paid after the collection was barred by the statute of limitations.

The defendant, in his affidavit of defense, admits all the allegations in the plaintiff’s statement of claim except the bar of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. United States v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Clinton Iron & Steel Co. v. HeinerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Erie Coal & Coke Co. v. HeinerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Burden, Smith & Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1928

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Neuland v. BowersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1930
  2. Heiner v. Bessemer Coal & Coke Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API