Legal Opinion

Clinton Iron & Steel Co. v. Heiner

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 12, 1929No. 5650PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIBSON, District Judge.

The plaintiff in the action at bar seeks to recover from the United States the sum of $222,856.06, with interest from June 7, 1926. To the statement of claim the defendant has filed tho statutory demurrer provided by the Pennsylvania Practice Act (Pa. St. 1920, §§ 17062-17326), and that demurrer is the subject of our present consideration.

The statement of claim sets forth that plaintiff, on March 15, 1919, filed with the defendant, collector of internal revenue, its tentative income and excess profits tax return for the calendar year 1918, and on June 16, 1919, filed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Heinszen & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Williamsport Wire Rope Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Sage v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Rafferty v. Smith, Bell & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. United States v. RussellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Oak Worsted Mills v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
  2. Regla Coal Co. v. BowersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1929
  3. North American Creamery Co. v. WillcutsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1930
  4. Erie Coal & Coke Co. v. HeinerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Brown's "Shamrock" Linens, Ltd. v. BowersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API