State v. Sedillo
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
OMAN, Judge.
Defendant was tried, convicted and sentenced to the New Mexico State Penitentiary for a term of two to ten years for the possession of marijuana. He is now before us on appeal from an order denying, without hearing, his motion under Rule 93 [§ 21-1-1(93), N.M.S.A.1953 (Supp.1967)].
His contentions as set forth in his motion are that his imprisonment and confinement are illegal because: (1) he was convicted and imprisoned without due process of law; (2) the prosecution on the trial failed to introduce into evidence the physical substance purporting to be maxdjuana; (3) there…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. WilliamsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. LobbNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. CrouchNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. SanchezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1966
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. BeachumNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
- State v. SisnerosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. SharpNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
- Nance v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.