Legal Opinion
State v. Beachum
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided February 4, 1972No. 762PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COWAN, Judge.
Defendant appeals from an order denying three motions, without a hearing, filed pursuant to Rule 93 [§ 21-1-1(93), N.M. S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 4)]. His conviction for armed robbery was affirmed by this court in State v. Beachum, 82 N.M. 204,, 477 P.2d 1019 (Ct.App.1970), rehearing denied November 25, 1970; second rehearing denied December 23, 1970.
The three motions are directed at the trial in the district court. We affirm.
The trial court, “having examined the files and records in this case”, denied the three motions on the ground that the “allegations” contained in the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Scott v. Murphy CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. SisnerosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. BeachumNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- State v. SedilloNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
- State v. DeckerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- State v. TrujilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. SalgadoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. LovatoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
- State v. TaylorNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- City of Las Cruces v. BetancourtNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.