Legal Opinion
Arnold Mauricio, Jr. v. Jack R. Duckworth, and Indiana Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided April 12, 1988No. 86-1842PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PELL, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petitioner-appellant, Arnold Mauricio (hereinafter Mauricio), appeals from the district court’s order denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Although the district court agreed with Mauricio’s claim that the State’s knowing failure to disclose the identity of an alibi rebuttal witness was a violation of due process, the court nevertheless concluded that the prosecution’s transgression amounted to harmless error. Mauricio v. Duckworth, 633 F.Supp. 1302 (N.D.Ind.1986).
I
Mauricio is presently serving a determinate 30-year sentence…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Wardius v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States of America Ex Rel. Johnnie L. Savory v. Michael Lane, Director, Illinois Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. Oliver L. NorthCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Roberto Gonzalez, Roberto Ramirez, Angel M. Amejeiras, Vicente Chao, Luis Gonzalez, and Rafael IzquierdoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Louis PirovolosCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Steven L. Toney v. James A. Gammon Jeremiah (Jay) W. NixonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Demetrio J. Hernandez and Wayne ParrishCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.