Legal Opinion

Reed v. Oakley

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1996PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Stephen A. Ferradino, J.

This action has arisen from a dispute over a franchise agreement. The defendants have previously moved to dismiss the complaint. In a decision dated January 4, 1996, the court granted an order denying the motion. The parties have now made a second round of motions. The plaintiffs have moved for an order dismissing the affirmative defenses, and granting summary judgment against defendant Oakley. The defendants have moved to dismiss the complaint against defendant Business and Franchise Corporation of America (hereinafter BFCA) for lack of subject…

2Cases cited7 opinions

A.J. Temple Marble & Tile, Inc. v. Union Carbide Marble Care, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
In re the Estate of KilloughNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
A.J. Temple Marble & Tile, Inc. v. Union Carbide Marble Care, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1994
In re the Claim of ForbesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
A.J. Temple Marble & Tile, Inc. v. Union Carbide Marble Care, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Sportique Motors, Ltd. v. Jaguar Cars, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2002