Legal Opinion
A.J. Temple Marble & Tile, Inc. v. Union Carbide Marble Care, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 23, 1994PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Herman Cahn, J.
Defendants move, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1), (5) and (7), to dismiss those portions of the complaint (first and second causes of action) alleging violations of the New York Franchise Sales Act (General Business Law § 680 et seq.; the Franchise Act), based upon:(a) defendants’ alleged representation that "a MarbleLife Franchise gave a franchisee the right to use the * * * recognized Union Carbide trademarks and service marks”;(b) defendants’ concealment of the existence of an alleged *943pre-existing "plan” to discontinue or dispose of the MarbleLife franchise…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sanders v. WinshipNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- In re Aaron J.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Anglin v. AnglinNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
3Cited by15 opinions
- Schwartzco Enterprises LLC v. TMH Management, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- A.J. Temple Marble & Tile, Inc. v. Union Carbide Marble Care, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Cook v. Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
- Edwards v. Kia Motors of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- To-Am Equipment Co. v. Mitsubishi Caterpillar Forklift AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.