Legal Opinion
Said v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 18, 2019No. Civil Action No. 15-1289 (RBW)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REGGIE B. WALTON, United States District Judge
The plaintiff, Cheryl Renee Said, initiated this civil action against the defendant, the National Railroad Passenger Corporation ("Amtrak"), alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("Title VII"), as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012), the Civil Rights Act of 1866, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (" § 1981"), the District of Columbia Human Rights Act ("DCHRA"), D.C. Code § 2-1401.01 to 1404.04 (2012), the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the *49United States Constitution, District of Columbia public…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Singh v. George Washington UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Abdulhussain v. MV Public Transportation IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023
- California Association of Private Postsecondary Schools v. DevosDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Freeman v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Graves-Buckingham v. MayorkasDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- Hamilton v. National Railroad Passenger CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.