Legal Opinion
Hamilton v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 18, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2019-1986Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HEATHER HAMILTON, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:19-cv-01986 (TNM) NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Heather Hamilton argues that her former employer, the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“Amtrak”), interfered with her ability to take leave under the Family Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”) and unlawfully fired her for taking such leave. Amtrak disagrees that it interfered with Hamilton’s leave and contends that it fired her for upgrading a customer for free in violation of its policies. It moves for…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Brady v. Office of the Sergeant at ArmsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Ross J. Laningham v. United States NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.