United States v. Howard
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
COLLIER, Chief Judge.
In this matter, the Court is being called upon to authorize the appointment of an expert in connection with a suppression hearing. A key issue to be determined at the suppression hearing is whether the drug-detection dog’s alert provided probable cause. After considering the specific facts of this case, the arguments of counsel, and the applicable law, the Court will DENY the Defendant’s Motion for Reconsideration of Appointment of Expert (Court File No. 91).
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the Court as a Motion for Reconsideration of Appointment of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Christopher v. HarburySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Illinois v. CaballesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- United States v. John Jay Hill and Malcolm Scott HillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Heriberto Navarro-Camacho v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. HowardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- State of Arizona v. Rosa Elene BecerraCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- United States v. Tommy CollierCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2024
- State of Arizona v. Rosa Elene BecerraCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016