Ybarra v. Saldana
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before KLINGEMAN, CLARK and BAS-KIN, JJ. KLINGEMAN, Justice.
Appellees Carlos Saldana, Miguel Salda-na, and Antonio Saldana, filed suit to recover damages from the commission of deceptive trade practices by appellant, A. Ybarra, pursuant to the Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act, Tex.Bus. & Com. Code Ann. § 17.50(a) (Vernon Supp. 1976-1977). 1 In a non-jury trial, the court found the appellee sustained actual damages of $11,098.74 which consisted of $6,098.74 as the reasonable and necessary amount spent by appellee over and above the contract price in order to complete…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Renfro Drug Co. v. LewisTexas Supreme Court · 1950
- Brown v. American Transfer & Storage Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
- Riverside National Bank v. LewisTexas Supreme Court · 1980
- Pennington v. SingletonTexas Supreme Court · 1980
- Smith v. BaldwinTexas Supreme Court · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Feinman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1986
- Vick v. George, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1983
- Walker & Associates Surveying, Inc. v. Austin, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2010
- Milt Ferguson Motor Co. v. Zeretzke, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1991
- Brown Foundation Repair & Consulting, Inc. v. McGuire, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.