Legal Opinion

Ybarra v. Saldana

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 25, 1981No. 16674PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before KLINGEMAN, CLARK and BAS-KIN, JJ. KLINGEMAN, Justice.

Appellees Carlos Saldana, Miguel Salda-na, and Antonio Saldana, filed suit to recover damages from the commission of deceptive trade practices by appellant, A. Ybarra, pursuant to the Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act, Tex.Bus. & Com. Code Ann. § 17.50(a) (Vernon Supp. 1976-1977). 1 In a non-jury trial, the court found the appellee sustained actual damages of $11,098.74 which consisted of $6,098.74 as the reasonable and necessary amount spent by appellee over and above the contract price in order to complete…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Renfro Drug Co. v. LewisTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Brown v. American Transfer & Storage Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Riverside National Bank v. LewisTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Pennington v. SingletonTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Smith v. BaldwinTexas Supreme Court · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Feinman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1986
  2. Vick v. George, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1983
  3. Walker & Associates Surveying, Inc. v. Austin, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2010
  4. Milt Ferguson Motor Co. v. Zeretzke, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1991
  5. Brown Foundation Repair & Consulting, Inc. v. McGuire, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API