Legal Opinion

In Re Colonial Pipeline Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1998No. 98-0039PublishedCited by 338 opinions

1Per curiam

In the case underlying this original mandamus proceeding, 3,275 plaintiffs sued three defendants alleging negligence, nuisance, and trespass as the result of the rupture of four pipelines containing hazardous substances. We must decide whether the trial court abused its discretion by issuing an order (1) prohibiting defendants from obtaining discovery from all but ten plaintiffs until after the first ten claims are resolved, (2) requiring defendants to create and produce an inventory list of all material previously produced by plaintiffs and defendants and between defendants in three related…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Beaumont Bank, N.A. v. BullerTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Tilton v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Jampole v. TouchyTexas Supreme Court · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by338 opinions

  1. Southwestern Refining Co., Inc. v. BernalTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In Re AIU Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In Re Alford Chevrolet-GeoTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  4. In Re KuntzTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  5. In Re Van Waters & Rogers, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2004

333 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API