Legal Opinion

Hicks v. City of Columbia

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 5, 1954No. 16901PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, Justice.

This appeal is from an order sustaining a demurrer to appellant’s complaint and poses the sole question of whether or not the complaint which alleges that plaintiff was injured by reason of a defect in a swing in a public park within the City of Columbia, said defect arising out of the neglect and mismanagement of the city, states a cause of action under Section 47-70 of the South Carolina Code of Laws for 1952.

The complaint, omitting the formal parts, alleges that plaintiff, a minor, is a resident of the City of Columbia and that on or about March 29, 1952, at about 8…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Irvine v. Town of GreenwoodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
  2. Reeves v. City of EasleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  3. Abernathy v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  4. Stone v. City of FlorenceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1913
  5. Haithcock v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McCall v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  2. McCall ex rel. Andrews v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  3. Belue v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  4. Collins v. CITY OF GREENVILLE, SCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
  5. Furr v. City of Rock HillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API