Legal Opinion

Furr v. City of Rock Hill

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 21, 1959No. 17559PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Moss, Justice.

This action was instituted by Mrs. Leo Furr, the respondent herein, against the City of Rock Hill, the appellant herein, to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by her as the result of negligence on the part of the appellant in the maintenance of one of its streets. The answer of the City was a denial of the material allegations of the complaint. The appellant also asserts that the place where the respondent was injured was not a street or public way, and therefore, it incurred no liability for said injuries.

The trial of this case, in the Circuit…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Irvine v. Town of GreenwoodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
  2. Reeves v. City of EasleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  3. Abernathy v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  4. Stone v. City of FlorenceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1913
  5. Parish v. Town of YorkvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. McCall v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  2. McCall ex rel. Andrews v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  3. Belue v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  4. Betty A. Horton v. United States v. City of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
  5. Lyon v. City of SumterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API