Legal Opinion

Belue v. City of Spartanburg

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 1, 1981No. 21470PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Littlejohn, Justice.

In this action Carl Belue, plaintiff (landowner), alleges that he is entitled to money damages against the defendants, City of Spartanburg- and its Water Works Department, because the City’s water main burst, flooding his property and damaging it. He seeks recovery on three theories:(1) Damage to his property was a taking within Article I, § 17 of the South Carolina Constitution;

*383(2) The bursting water main and subsequent damage to his property constituted a nuisance, and/or(3) The bursting water main and subsequent damage was caused by City’s negligence in maintaining the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Boyce v. Lancaster County Natural Gas AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Furr v. City of Rock HillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
  3. Teague v. Cherokee County Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
  4. Hicks v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
  5. Kline v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. McCall v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  2. White v. County of NewberryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  3. Jensen v. ConradDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1983
  4. Coffin v. South Carolina Department of Social ServicesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1983
  5. McCall ex rel. Andrews v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API