Legal Opinion
Gaddis v. Rudy Patrick Seed Division
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided October 2, 1972No. 25885PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WASSERSTROM, Judge.
Respondent filed claim before the Workmen’s Compensation Commission for occupational disease. An award was made in her favor by the Referee, and that award was affirmed by the Industrial Commission. On appeal to the Circuit Court by the employer and its insurer, that Court again affirmed. The employer and its insurer now appeal to this Court. We likewise affirm.
The facts in skeletal form are as follows. The claimant commenced work for the employer in 1950. At that time she was in good health, and had no disability. She had a childhood disease of whooping cough and later…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Collins v. Neevel Luggage Manufacturing CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
- Chevrolet Muncie Division of General Motors Corp. v. HirstIndiana Court of Appeals · 1943
- Bess v. Coca-Cola Bottling Company of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
- Sanford v. Valier-Spies Milling Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1950
- Fitzgerald v. Fisher Body St. Louis Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Skinner v. Dawson Metal ProductsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- Martinez v. University of CaliforniaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
- Estes v. Noranda Aluminum, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- Sheehan v. Springfield Seed & Floral, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987