Cheney v. Barker
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Petition, filed in the Supreme Judicial Court for the county of Suffolk October 28, 1907, for a writ of certiorari to quash an order of the board of gas and electric light commissioners granting to the Boston Consolidated Gas Company locations for a pipe line in certain highways in Chelsea; also Two petitions, filed in the same court on November 20, 1907, for writs of mandamus directing the aldermen and the superintendent of streets of Chelsea, respectively, to issue to the…
Read the full summary
Petition, filed in the Supreme Judicial Court for the county of Suffolk October 28, 1907, for a writ of certiorari to quash an order of the board of gas and electric light commissioners granting to the Boston Consolidated Gas Company locations for a pipe line in certain highways in Chelsea; also Two petitions, filed in the same court on November 20, 1907, for writs of mandamus directing the aldermen and the superintendent of streets of Chelsea, respectively, to issue to the petitioner a permit to open and make excavations in Williams Street for the purpose of laying its pipe line therein in…
1Opinion of the CourtSheldon, J.
The first of these cases is a petition for a writ of certiorari to quash an order of the board of gas and electric light commissioners granting to the Boston Consolidated Gas Company, hereinafter called the Boston Company, or simply the company, locations for a pipe line in certain streets, lanes and highways in the city of Chelsea. It has been reserved for the consideration of this court upon the petition and answer and return of the respondents, and certain agreed facts. The Boston Company is the lawful successor in title to the Massachusetts Pipe Line Gas Company, under St. 1903, c. 417,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Prince v. CrockerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
- Pierce v. DrewMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
- Commonwealth v. MorrisonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Sears v. CrockerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
- Bloomfield & Rochester Natural Gas-Light Co. v. CalkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Crocker v. Justices of the Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Boston Edison Co. v. Board of Selectmen of ConcordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
- Assessors of Quincy v. Boston Consolidated Gas Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Hill Farm, Inc. v. Hill CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1969
- State Ex. Rel. York v. B. of C. Com'rsWashington Supreme Court · 1947
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.