Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Chamberlain

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided November 15, 1858PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Question as to taxation of costs. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHiltoh, J.

—Upon the trial of this action the defendant was examined as a witness in his own behalf. Judgment having *454been rendered in his favor, the question now presented is, whether he is entitled to the fees of a witness in travelling from Rochester to attend the trial.

The Code (§ 311) requires the clerk, on the application of the prevailing party, to insert in the entry of judgment “ the allowances for costs,” “ the necessary disbursements, including the fees of officers allowed by law, the fees of witnesses, the reasonable compensation to commissioners in taking depositions, the fees of referees,…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mazet v. CrowCity of New York Municipal Court · 1890
  2. Mazet v. CrowCity of New York Municipal Court · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API