Mazet v. Crow

The only question to be determined, on this motion is whether the plaintiff should be permitted to *373■discontinue the action upon payment of but one bill of costs. This action is on a promissory note, brought by the indorsee against the maker and indorser thereof. The summons and complaint were served on the defendant Hazard on or about the 18th day of January, 1890, and on the 24th day of January, 1890, his separate answer was served. The summons :tmd complaint were not served on the defendant Crow until on dr about the 11th day of March, 1890, and his separate .answer was served on the 28th…