Legal Opinion

Mazet v. Crow

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided April 7, 1890PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action by Bobert Mazet against Moses B. Crow and Boland M. Hazard. Plaintiff moves for leave to discontinue the action.

1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.

The only question to be determined on this motion is whether the plaintiff should be permitted to discontinue the action upon pay*744ment of but one bill of costs. This action is on a promissory note, brought by the indorsee against the maker and indorser thereof. The summons and complaint were served on the defendant Hazard on or about January 18,1890, and on January 24, 1890, his separate answer was served. The summons and complaint were not served on the defendant Crow until on or about March 11, 1890, and his separate answer was served on March 28, 1890. The defendants appear by the same…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Walker v. RussellNew York Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Lindslay v. DeafendorfNew York Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Rogers v. ChamberlainNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1858

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Coles v. CarrollAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API