Legal Opinion

Polk v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1947PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHecht, J.

This is an application for leave to serve a notice of claim on the City of New York pursuant to the provisions of section 50-e of the General Municipal Law. Petitioners intend to bring an action against the City of New York for the alleged malpractice of a doctor in the city’s employ (General Municipal Law, § 50-d). The city objects to granting this motion on the grounds that the proposed notice does not indicate that the doctor is being joined in the action and that a notice must be served on him as well as on the city. If the doctor were to be joined, such a notice must be served on him and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Derlicka v. LeoNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  2. Schmid v. WernerNew York Supreme Court · 1947

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schmid v. WernerNew York Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Hencken v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1949
  3. Sandak v. Tuxedo Union School District No. 3New York Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API