Legal Opinion

Rutherford v. City of Portland

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 20, 1985PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VIOLETTE, Justice.

Merton Rutherford appeals from a decision of the Superior Court, Cumberland County, after a jury-waived trial that granted judgment for the City of Portland. The court concluded that Rutherford’s negligence claims were barred by the Maine Tort Claims Act and that Rutherford failed to demonstrate a breach of his employment contract. We agree and affirm the Superi- or Court’s decision.

I

Merton Rutherford began employment with the Portland Fire Department in 1968. During the time relevant to this action, his employment contract incorporated several documents: an agreement…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Faucher v. City of AuburnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  2. Drake v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  3. McCoy v. Board of Fire & Police Commissioners of the Village of Hanover ParkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  4. Whitt v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Brunke v. Board of Fire & Police CommissionersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Moore v. City of LewistonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
  2. Maynard v. Commissioner of CorrectionsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  3. Francis v. Dana-CummingsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
  4. Ellis v. MeadeDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1995
  5. PARLIN v. Cumberland CountyDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API