Legal Opinion

PARLIN v. Cumberland County

District Court, D. Maine

Decided September 11, 2009No. 1:08-cr-00186PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

GEORGE Z. SINGAL, District Judge.

Before the Court is the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Docket # 43) by Defendants Cumberland County, Mark Dion, Mary Sorrells, Carl Hitchcock, and David Dunnemann. As explained herein, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Docket # 43).

I. SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARD

Generally, a party is entitled to summary judgment if, on the record before the Court, it appears “that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. ADAMS v. MAGNUSSONDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2022
  2. CANTRELL v. BRUNSWICK MAINE POLICEDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2024
  3. Pierce v. LeMasterDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2024
  4. TAIT v. LAKE REGION SCHOOL DISTRICTDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API