PARLIN v. Cumberland County
District Court, D. Maine
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
GEORGE Z. SINGAL, District Judge.
Before the Court is the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Docket # 43) by Defendants Cumberland County, Mark Dion, Mary Sorrells, Carl Hitchcock, and David Dunnemann. As explained herein, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Docket # 43).
I. SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARD
Generally, a party is entitled to summary judgment if, on the record before the Court, it appears “that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- ADAMS v. MAGNUSSONDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2022
- CANTRELL v. BRUNSWICK MAINE POLICEDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2024
- Pierce v. LeMasterDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2024
- TAIT v. LAKE REGION SCHOOL DISTRICTDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2024