Jacobson v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Curiam,
Plaintiff sued to recover for personal injuries alleged to be due to the negligence of defendant; the jury found for the latter; the court below granted a new trial; defendant has appealed.
In its opinion, the court below states two reasons for awarding a new trial. Appellant argues that neither of these reasons warrants the order appealed from; but, in several recent cases, we have said that, when a new trial is directed, unless the order to that effect is accompanied by a statement that the reasons expressed are the only ones which moved the court to grant it, we assume that the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Regan v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Grossman v. Bessemer & Lake Erie R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cuteri v. West Penn Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Fisher Motor Co., Inc. v. ReppertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929