Grossman v. Bessemer & Lake Erie R. R.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
This is an appeal , by defendant from an order granting plaintiff a new trial, after verdict rendered in favor of defendant. The opinion of the court below sets forth a number of reasons in support of its order, but does not indicate, either expressly or otherwise, that these were the ■ exclusive reasons for granting the new trial; under such circumstances, we will not interfere. In Feite v. Coll, 285 Pa. 151, 152, 153, we recently said: “The opinion of the court below does not conclusively show that the reasons there stated and discussed were the only ones which controlled the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Feite v. GollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
3Cited by8 opinions
- Regan v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Streilein v. VogelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Lasch v. CohnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Baldus v. JeremiasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Pawlowski v. SczehowiczSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.