Legal Opinion

Grossman v. Bessemer & Lake Erie R. R.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 16, 1927No. Appeal, 27PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This is an appeal , by defendant from an order granting plaintiff a new trial, after verdict rendered in favor of defendant. The opinion of the court below sets forth a number of reasons in support of its order, but does not indicate, either expressly or otherwise, that these were the ■ exclusive reasons for granting the new trial; under such circumstances, we will not interfere. In Feite v. Coll, 285 Pa. 151, 152, 153, we recently said: “The opinion of the court below does not conclusively show that the reasons there stated and discussed were the only ones which controlled the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Feite v. GollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Regan v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Streilein v. VogelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Lasch v. CohnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Baldus v. JeremiasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Pawlowski v. SczehowiczSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API