Legal Opinion

Cuteri v. West Penn Railways Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 7, 1931No. Appeal, 176PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Plaintiff sued in trespass to recover for .injuries received when his automobile, in which he was riding, was struck by one of defendant’s electric passenger cars. The verdict was for plaintiff. The court below refused defendant’s motion for judgment non obstante veredicto but allowed the motion for a new trial. Defendant appealed.

Appellant assigns as error refusal of the court below, first, to give binding instructions in its favor, second, to enter judgment non obstante veredicto, and finally, the granting of a new trial.

Plaintiff was struck while on defendant’s track, at a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mudano v. Phila. Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Regan v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Thomas v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Saxman v. McCormickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  5. Mills v. Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bellettiere v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Commonwealth v. PowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Commonwealth v. ChopakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Kelly v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Streilein v. VogelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API