State v. Valerie Saxion, Inc. and Valerie Saxion, Individually
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOB McCOY, Justice.
I. Introduction
In two issues in this accelerated interlocutory appeal, Appellants the State of Texas and Greg Abbott, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Texas (collectively, the State) argue that the trial court erred by denying their plea to the jurisdiction on the Free Exercise and federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) claims of Appellees Valerie Saxion, Inc. and Valerie Saxion, individually (collectively, Saxion). See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem.Code Ann. § 51.014(a)(5), (8) (West 2008 & Supp. 2014). The State presents this as a case…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- City of Boerne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission v. IT-DavyTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- The City of El Paso v. Lilli M. HeinrichTexas Supreme Court · 2009
- City of Rockwall v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 2008
- Hernandez v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rogers v. RREF II CB Acquisitions, LLCCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Ex Parte Leonardo Nuncio, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2019
- D Magazine Partners, L.P. v. ReyesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Dianne Hensley v. State Commission on Judicial ConductTexas Supreme Court · 2024