Home Savings Bank v. General Finance Corp.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
Plaintiff bank points out that it is not attempting to recover from General Finance upon an accepted bill of exchange. “. . . The acceptance must be in writing and signed by the drawee. . . .” Sec. 118.07, Stats. Plaintiff bank does claim, however, that General Finance orally promised to accept the draft if the bank would certify the $9,700 check payable to General Finance; that the bank did so, and thereby accepted the offer and furnished consideration for the promise; that no statute requires such contract to be in writing to be enforceable. Secondly, plaintiff bank claims a cause of action…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hale v. KreiselWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- Arjay Investment Co. v. KohlmetzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Kelley Lumber Co. v. WoelfelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Peterson v. Union National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1866
- Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Universal C.I.T. Credit Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bailey v. WestSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1969
- GEBHARDT BROS., INC. v. BrimmelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Martens v. MetzgarAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Oosterwyk v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Earthmovers of Fairbanks, Inc. v. Pacific Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980