Legal Opinion

Home Savings Bank v. General Finance Corp.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1960PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

Plaintiff bank points out that it is not attempting to recover from General Finance upon an accepted bill of exchange. “. . . The acceptance must be in writing and signed by the drawee. . . .” Sec. 118.07, Stats. Plaintiff bank does claim, however, that General Finance orally promised to accept the draft if the bank would certify the $9,700 check payable to General Finance; that the bank did so, and thereby accepted the offer and furnished consideration for the promise; that no statute requires such contract to be in writing to be enforceable. Secondly, plaintiff bank claims a cause of action…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hale v. KreiselWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Arjay Investment Co. v. KohlmetzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Kelley Lumber Co. v. WoelfelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Peterson v. Union National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1866
  5. Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Universal C.I.T. Credit Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bailey v. WestSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1969
  2. GEBHARDT BROS., INC. v. BrimmelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Martens v. MetzgarAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Oosterwyk v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Earthmovers of Fairbanks, Inc. v. Pacific Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API