Earthmovers of Fairbanks, Inc. v. Pacific Insurance Co.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BURKE, Justice.
The basic issue raised by this appeal is whether the plaintiff below, Earthmovers of Fairbanks, Inc., was entitled to a 22% profit and overhead markup from Pacific Insurance Company, on parts which Earthmovers, Inc., had purchased to repair a damaged crane. The appeal was brought by Earthmovers, Inc., after entry of a judgment in favor of Pacific.
The crane was insured against damage by Pacific, under an insurance policy issued to H & S Earthmovers, a joint venture.1 The joint venture and Earthmovers, Inc., are separate entities. After the crane was damaged by a truck…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Merrill Ex Rel. Merrill v. FaltinAlaska Supreme Court · 1967
- Jackson v. WhiteAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Curt's Trucking Co. v. City of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- BB & S. Construction Co., Inc. v. StoneAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Martens v. MetzgarAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Andy L. James v. Alaska Frontier Constructors, Inc. and Nanuq, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2020
- Orville Wesley Jenkins Layton v. Mary Tabitha O'Dea, f/k/a Mary Tabitha O-Dea-LaytonAlaska Supreme Court · 2022