Legal Opinion

Earthmovers of Fairbanks, Inc. v. Pacific Insurance Co.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1980No. 4222PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURKE, Justice.

The basic issue raised by this appeal is whether the plaintiff below, Earthmovers of Fairbanks, Inc., was entitled to a 22% profit and overhead markup from Pacific Insurance Company, on parts which Earthmovers, Inc., had purchased to repair a damaged crane. The appeal was brought by Earthmovers, Inc., after entry of a judgment in favor of Pacific.

The crane was insured against damage by Pacific, under an insurance policy issued to H & S Earthmovers, a joint venture.1 The joint venture and Earthmovers, Inc., are separate entities. After the crane was damaged by a truck…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Merrill Ex Rel. Merrill v. FaltinAlaska Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Jackson v. WhiteAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Curt's Trucking Co. v. City of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  4. BB & S. Construction Co., Inc. v. StoneAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Martens v. MetzgarAlaska Supreme Court · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Andy L. James v. Alaska Frontier Constructors, Inc. and Nanuq, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Orville Wesley Jenkins Layton v. Mary Tabitha O'Dea, f/k/a Mary Tabitha O-Dea-LaytonAlaska Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API