Legal Opinion
Horner v. Governor of New Hampshire
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided June 19, 2008No. 2007-668PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBroderick, C.J.
The plaintiff, Philip S. Horner, appeals an order of the Superior Court (Smukler, J.) denying his petition for a writ of prohibition to enjoin the State from enforcing RSA 651-B:11 (2007 & Supp. 2007), which mandates the collection of a sex offender registration fee. We affirm.
The plaintiff was convicted in 2000 of five counts of felonious sexual assault, see RSA 632-A:3 (2007). Every sex offender and offender against children is required to register with the New Hampshire Division of State Police (division) which maintains the sex offender registry. RSA 651-B:2,1 (2007), :11, I (Supp. 2007).…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Baines v. New Hampshire Senate PresidentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- State v. CostelloSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
- State v. ComeauSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1953
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Doe v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
- Doe v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
- Doe v. New Hampshire Department of SafetySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- Doe v. NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPT. OF SAFETYSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010