Legal Opinion

Appeal of the Town of Nottingham

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 19, 2006No. 2004-601PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDalianis, J.

The petitioners, Town of Nottingham, Town of Barrington and Save Our Groundwater (SOG), appeal the issuance by the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services (DES) of a large groundwater withdrawal permit to the respondent, USA Springs, Inc. We affirm.

The following facts were found by DES or appear on the record before us. On May 24,2001, USA Springs applied to DES for a large groundwater withdrawal permit, see RSA 485-C:21 (2001) (amended 2005), proposing to withdraw up to 439,200 gallons of water per day from a spring and three bedrock wells for the purpose of bottling water.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hansen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  3. Appeal of RichardsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  4. Bassett v. Salisbury Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1862
  5. Kenison v. DuboisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Appeal of Town of BethlehemSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
  2. Petition of Chase Home for ChildrenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  3. Petition of Gregory MalisosSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
  4. Appeal of AlexanderSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
  5. David Montenegro v. New Hampshire Division of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API