Legal Opinion

Clark v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 12, 2000No. 29A02-9902-CV-139PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VAIDIK, Judge

Case Summary 1

Appellants, George N. Clark, et al. (“Subclass”) appeal the trial court’s grant of partial summary judgment to CSX Transportation, Inc. (CSX). Specifically, the Subclass contends that the trial court erred in construing certain deeds as conveyances of fee simple title to CSX rather than as easements.

CSX cross-appeals the trial court’s grant of partial summary judgment to the Subclass. CSX contends that the trial court erred in construing two deeds as conveyances of an easement rather than fee simple. CSX also asserts that its due process rights were violated.…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Joy v. St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Stephenson v. LedbetterIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Hunter v. MilhousIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Brown v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Ross, Inc. v. LeglerIndiana Supreme Court · 1964

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. C & G, INC. v. RuleIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Macy Elevator, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  3. Indiana Department of Transportation v. Shelly & Sands, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Adams v. ReinakerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Poznic v. Porter County Development Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API