Legal Opinion

Portland Trailer & Equipment, Inc. v. A-1 Freeman Moving & Storage, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 28, 2000No. 9805-03819; CA A104316PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.

Pursuant to ORAP 6.25, defendant Robertson petitions for reconsideration of our opinion, Portland Trailer & Equipment v. A-1 Freeman Moving, 166 Or App 651, 5 P3d 604 (2000), in which we concluded that Oregon courts have personal jurisdiction over defendants pursuant to ORCP 4 L in this action. Defendant Robertson requests that we delete the bracketed language from the following sentences:

“Plaintiffs prevailed in the arbitration proceeding [and were awarded their attorney fees by the arbitrator]. Freeman requested trial de novo but ultimately dismissed the Oklahoma action without prejudice.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Portland Trailer & Equipment, Inc. v. A-1 Freeman Moving & Storage, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Portland Trailer & Equipment, Inc. v. A-1 Freeman Moving & Storage, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. O'Neil v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. Harris v. SunigaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  4. Ram Technical Services, Inc. v. KoreskoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  5. Cerner Middle East Ltd. v. Belbadi Enterprises LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API