Portland Trailer & Equipment, Inc. v. A-1 Freeman Moving & Storage, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.
Pursuant to ORAP 6.25, defendant Robertson petitions for reconsideration of our opinion, Portland Trailer & Equipment v. A-1 Freeman Moving, 166 Or App 651, 5 P3d 604 (2000), in which we concluded that Oregon courts have personal jurisdiction over defendants pursuant to ORCP 4 L in this action. Defendant Robertson requests that we delete the bracketed language from the following sentences:
“Plaintiffs prevailed in the arbitration proceeding [and were awarded their attorney fees by the arbitrator]. Freeman requested trial de novo but ultimately dismissed the Oklahoma action without prejudice.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Portland Trailer & Equipment, Inc. v. A-1 Freeman Moving & Storage, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
3Cited by14 opinions
- Portland Trailer & Equipment, Inc. v. A-1 Freeman Moving & Storage, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- O'Neil v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- Harris v. SunigaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Ram Technical Services, Inc. v. KoreskoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Cerner Middle East Ltd. v. Belbadi Enterprises LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.