Gomez v. Scanlan
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtCooper, J.
This action was brought to recover damages, in the sum of $500, against defendant Seanlan, as constable, and the other defendants as sureties on his official bond, for false imprisonment. The ease was tried before a jury, and a verdict rendered for plaintiff in the sum of $500. This appeal is from the judgment on the judgment-roll without a bill of exceptions.
The action was brought by John H. Gomez and Magdalena Gomez, his wife, for false imprisonment and wrongs committed by defendant Seanlan on the person of the wife. Defendants claim that their demurrer, which was on the ground of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McKune v. Santa Clara Valley Mill & Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- People v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Tell v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Matthew v. Central Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Felonicher v. StingleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Moody v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Gomez v. ScanlanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Fox Tucson Theatres Corp. v. LindsayArizona Supreme Court · 1936