Legal Opinion

Felonicher v. Stingley

California Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1904No. S.F. No. 3518PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. George E. Church, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

COOPER, C.

Action to recover damages for trespass brought against defendant Stingley, as constable, and the other defendants, sureties on his official bond.

Plaintiff recovered judgment,' from which this appeal is taken on the judgment-roll. The complaint alleges: “That on or about the sixth day of January, 1902, at Sanger, in the county of Fresno, said defendant, Samuel Stingley, acting in his official capacity as such constable as aforesaid, and without authority of law, and without cause and without right, willfully, maliciously, and knowingly did make and cause to be made upon Mrs.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lammon v. FeusierSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Eaton v. . Kelly .Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
  3. Hawkins v. ThomasIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Holliman v. Carroll's Adm'rsTexas Supreme Court · 1863
  5. Van Pelt v. LittlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Abbott v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Gomez v. ScanlanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Miles v. WrightArizona Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Homan v. Wayer320California Court of Appeal · 1908
  5. Geros v. HarriesUtah Supreme Court · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API